Nox not only felt slow but also scored the worst here. UI/UX didn't feel as snappy and responsive as Bluestacks but I would probably still use this instead since it actually displayed textures properly. Textures also seemed less broken in the pie version. The Nougat 64-bit version with hyper-v is a little faster than the Pie 64-bit version without hyper-v, however, I think having the new Android version for its newer APIs and better compatibility with newer games/apps make the tradeoff worth it. The 240 FPS results were worse than the 120 FPS results by a bit too. The OpenGL version was also significantly faster. Bluestacks Bluestacksīluestacks had corrupted/broken textures that showed as weird neon colors so even though it scored pretty decent I don't think I would trust it much. Mumu has a softer, foggier look, that is light in color, LD player has a more contrasty, saturated, darker look. Strangely enough, I found the graphics to look different between Mumu and LD Player. LD Player is running on Android 9 and is probably best used for older games as well, but is also more likely to be more stable than Mumu X. Mumu 6 runs on android 6 but will be more stable, this is likely better for older games, while Mumu X is running on android 12 and will have the best support for newer games. Sure one or the other is slightly faster but I would put it all in the same tier of performance. Mumu 6 and Mumu X Beta all scored great as well. This one had me disable Hyper-V and all the other virtualization stuff, which I would have needed to MuMu as well anyways. The drag and drop to install APK is nice. LD Player scored fantastically, the best of the bunch. B Tier: Bluestacks 5 Nougat w/ Hyper-V (DirectX), Memu w/ Hyper-V.A Tier: Mumu Nebula, Bluestacks 5 Nougat w/ Hyper-V (OpenGL), Bluestacks 5 Pie no Hyper-V (OpenGL).Android Emulator Performance Tier List 2023 My system is a relatively recent clean install of windows and has up-to-date drivers. 64-bit binaries were used where available. Also went through the pain of comparing DirectX to OpenGL for some of the emulators. I did test Bluestacks at 240 fps in a few results just to see if it would make a difference but it actually scored a little worse than 120 fps. An Emulator Benchmarking tool like Antutu is a great way to check your emulator's actual speed.Įverything was tested at 1920x1080, 120 fps (unless otherwise noted), 4 cores and 4 GB memory since this was the highest some of these emulators would go. After all, we can't really get a comparison if the benchmark only works in one of the emulators. Antutu is the only benchmarking tool that works on all emulators - GFX Bench, 3dmark.etc do not consistently work. About Emulator BenchmarkĪll testing is done with settings as consistent as possible between emulators, and otherwise their most optimal configuration + setup ( so things like having Hyper-V turned on or off where needed for best performance, etc). In this article, Gurugamer is going to showcase a benchmarked tier list for all top tier emulators to see which one is the fastest. There are a lot of new android emulators in the market nowadays, and your trusty emulator might not work as well as some of the newer arrivals.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |